Comic Book Bin 
 
 Comics
 Comic Reviews
 Manga Reviews
 Comic News
 Spotlight
 Phil's Bubble
 European Comics
 Canuck
 Black Astronaut (25)
 Comics 101
 Web Comics
 Comic Strips
 
 Action Figures
 
 Video Games
 
 Fan Films
 
 Movies
 
 Books
 
 Interviews
 
 About
 Classifieds
 Newsletter
 RSS

Comics : Black Astronaut
Last Updated: Aug 21, 2008 - 3:13:23 PM




Dey's Calls it Satire - The Obamas' New Yorker Cover
By Leroy Obama Douresseaux
Jul 21, 2008 - 10:40:37 AM

Email this article
 Printer friendly page

Add to Del.icio.us     Add To Reddit
Add To Digg     Add To Stumbleupon
Add To Technorati Favorites     Add To Ask


charlie_1.jpg

Mr. Charlie #120 wants to say some things about what should fall out of New Yorker magazine’s “Obamas” cover:

The recent furor over artist Barry Blitt’s cover for the July 21, 2008 issue of New Yorker magazine is dying down, but I’ve come to pick at that corpse, too.  The cover in question, which depicts Barack and Michelle Obama as radicals/terrorists, is still before our eyes, and even after this particular issue disappears from the newsstands, African-Americans will still need to deal with the issues this cover raises.  It certainly has made me think about the media and the way it depicts African-Americans, especially young black men, and the way it portrays African-American politicians and activists.

Yeah, I get it.  Ah’s not a complete dumb darkie!  The New Yorker is the child of Juvenal and Horace.  It’s satire!!! Yea, me!  Barack in the now-stereotyped garb of a Muslim terrorist!  Michelle wearing an afro and dressed like a cross between a Castro guerilla and a Black Panther, with her camouflage pants, a rifle (AK-47?), and an ammo belt slung over her shoulder.  See the loving couple share a “terrorist fist bump” (term courtesy of one of FOX News’ resident dumb bitches, E.D. Hill).  In the background, a photo of Osama bin Laden hangs over the fireplace, a fireplace in which the American flag burns.  Satire in the house!

This cover image, which I’m including with this column, is so over-the-top that we just can’t possibly take it seriously… should we?  HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!  Hee Hee Hee Hee Hee Hee!  Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho!  Oh, lawdy, how droll!  How witty! How urbane!  I have to laugh.

Hold up!  I’m not willing to buy into the notion that this New Yorker cover was solely meant to satirize the kind of underground, somewhat web-based, whisper campaign against Barack HUSSEIN Obama – that he is a closeted Muslim – a sort of al-Qaeda version of The Manchurian Candidate.  This cover is as much a publicity stunt as it is simply a smart magazine being on the cutting edge of social commentary.  The New Yorker is probably bleeding readers and subscribers for its print version just like many magazines and newspapers, which is a shame because it truly is a great magazine.  Perhaps, this sort of cover will at least get more people talking about the New Yorker.

newyorker.jpg
That cover

However, this controversy got me to thinking.  In what we would call the halls of power of American media, African-Americans are scarce.  With just a few exceptions, black people aren’t calling the shots.  Blacks aren’t deciding what’s on the cover of major magazines.  When it comes to coverage of politics, society, and culture, black commentators are mostly tokens – if they appear at all, although I must say that it’s better than it was even just two years ago.  One of the good things that came out of Don Imus’ controversial remarks about the Rutgers University women’s basketball team is that Reverends Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton loudly raised the issue of the absence of faces of color on network and cable TV political programs.  I think that’s paid off with more African-Americans, including liberals, moderates and conservatives, showing up as experts and commentators (at least on CNN and MSNBC).

I look at the New Yorker “Obamas” cover and see a vulgar cartoon depiction of a black man and his wife, and I wonder where the balance is.  I know that I’m not alone in this, but on the web, on TV, and in the press, we had a lot of white people explaining to black people what blacks should think.  Sure, this cover may be satire, but many black people see something else – the perpetuation of negative images of black people.  Too many white people don’t understand the anger over that cover because they simply can’t or won’t see things from the perspective of many African-Americans, a group of people who have not only been second class citizens for most of the United States’ existence, but also has been subject to a non-stop barrage of destructive portrayals in the mass culture.

But I’m not going to “blame whitey.”  Far be it for me to treat African-Americans as a monolithic group, considering that there are so many regional/cultural variations of the descendants of the African Diaspora.  Speaking in general terms, however, we’ve failed to grasp control of the existing media or develop enough strong media of our own to counter a mainstream media that for decades has mostly portrayed black people in America as shiftless, murderous, lazy, illiterate, second class citizens, or at least possessing opinions that will not be heard unless we march or stupidly burn down our own neighborhoods.

Back in the late 1980’s, columnist George Will declared that racism was over in America because of the popularity of Bill Cosby, Oprah Winfrey, and Michael Jordan.  Will’s golden age, however, was marred by Willie Horton and just a few years later, North Carolina U.S. Senator Jesse Helm’s infamous “hands” campaign ad.  As Spike Lee would point out around that time: FOX’s then-new series, “COPS” just furthered the image in many white Americans’ minds of black men as criminals or criminals just waiting to be arrested.  To be fair to “COPS,” they were just perpetuating what local and national news had already been doing practically forever – demonizing black men.  [I don’t even want to get into how black women are denigrated.]  What media gave African-Americans a voice where they could protest race-baiting politics and the hateful imagery of the culture?

We’ve simply failed to counter that.  Magazines like Ebony and Jet present positive images of African-Americans, but can’t really counter a deluge of images in print and electronic media of black men as hulking, drug-dealing, baby-making, gang-banging sub-humans.  Sadly for most of the last two decades African-Americans that gained a voice in pop culture have chosen to continue to abuse the image of African-Americans for the sake of personal wealth with misogyny, trashy movies, and violent entertainment.  As Kanye West said, “They made us love their wealth and hate ourselves?”

So the New Yorker cover, seen from the perspective of many African-Americans – even the few of us who are semi-literate enough to get the satire – is merely a lite version of the historically despicable depictions of black people that seem traditional in American media and culture.  While we battle pop culture, we must also battle for our voices to be heard in politics – so that our satire will be as potent as and perhaps will be a balance to something like the New Yorker’s cover.  I’m not talking about separate but equal, but if black people are going to be portrayed in a way that balances positive and negative and reflects the diversity of African-Americans, it seems as if we’ll have to do that on our own.

That’s why I hope that former Congressman J.C. Watts is able to find funding for his black public affairs and politics cable network that was announced earlier this year.  We can’t blame white people when we haven’t taken the initiative to not just participate in media, but also develop more media in which we call the shots.  BET, The Source, and The Final Call just ain’t gonna cut it.  Don’t blame.  Take the lead.  I think Barack and Michelle would agree.



Related Articles:
Art Spiegelman Talks Comics Politics In Toronto



Comment Script Join the discussion:

Add a Comment

Comments

Great article Leroy. Way to bring it back around smoothly right at the end.
#1 - Eli Green - 07/21/2008 - 14:11
Thanks, Eli. I had a hard time keeping this beast under control. It was supposed to have gone up by at least Saturday.
#2 - Leroy Douressaux - 07/21/2008 - 16:06
There was a conversation about this at The Daily Heller (bubblegum://blog.printmag.com/dailyheller/Now+Class+What+Is+Satire.aspx)
in which Mike Dooley pointed out that this cover depended on irony, which is the reason for its failure. If you recall, Art Spiegelman defended Blitt's cartoon, and Spiegelman's own controversial cover, The Kiss, was roped in to show us all just how great Blitt's cover was. Dooley notes that The Kiss relied on metaphor, a more successful device than irony. It reminded me that I had argued recently to my husband that the time for irony in art and commentary has passed. But I can't recall why I was so sure of that! Still, somehow, Blitt's New Yorker cover seems to back me. One other point: I read a lengthy article in the Wall Street Journal describing the chain of events that led to Don Imus' firing from his radio talk show. This was awhile ago, as you know, but IIRC, then senior management at the network was compelled to respond to Imus' distressing comments by the organized actions of the union of African-American workers at the network. I was so deeply impressed by that, and thought it shouldn't be forgotten. Not to undermine your point -- most media suits are filled by white men, and it would be ideal for that to change.
#3 - Beth - 07/21/2008 - 20:24
This actually goes into Spiegelman's discussion about The Art of Outrage, which he spoke on when he was here in Toronto.

Art truly does evoke emotion, but what's great about what Leroy has done with it is that he has followed through with what Spiegelman hopes will come from controversial art. Not outrage, open discourse. The discussion has begun.
#4 - Eli Green - 07/22/2008 - 00:31
I do want to emphasize that I understand the use of metaphor and irony. The point of this is that many African-Americans are sensitive about how Barack and Michelle are depicted in the media, regardless of these depictions' original intent. In that context, whatever Blitt meant is not the point. The cover is placed, absent its meanings, with a pile of stuff that upsets people who fear for the Obamas - even if we are being overly sensitive.

Blitt's cover does work as satire. But it's also part of something that vexes us.
#5 - Leroy Douresseaux - 07/23/2008 - 11:24
We'll have to agree to disagree on that point, Leroy! I didn't think Blitt's cover worked at all.
#6 - Beth - 07/23/2008 - 19:00

© Copyright 2002-2008, Coolstreak Cartoons Inc. - All rights Reserved. All other texts, images, characters and trademarks are copyright their respective owners. Use of material in this document(including reproduction, modification, distribution, electronic transmission or republication) without prior written permission is strictly prohibited.

Top of Page

Search

President-elect Obama in Comic Books
Will the portrayal of President-elect Obama change in fictional comic book universes?
Nat Turner Vol. 2 of 2: Revolution
Bloody hell closes the second half of Kyle Baker's tremendous "Nat Turner."
Static #5 (Milestone Media)
Like Spider-Man before him, Static finds his black and white world beset by gray realities.
Remembering Bernie Mac
The raucous comedian left behind his cult, fringe status and moved onto mainstream success in film and TV.
Dey's Calls it Satire - The Obamas' New Yorker Cover
But it's really a call to action.
Nat Turner Encore Edition: Volume 1
With the publication of the new Image Comics-edition "Nat Turner" trade collections, the Bin looks back at Kyle Baker's acclaimed graphic novel.
Will Nick Fury Come back as a Black Guy after Secret Invasion?
I’ve had this hunch for a while now that Nick Fury in the regular Marvel comic book universe will come back as a black guy, probably quite related to Samuel L. Jackson
Satchel Paige: Striking Out Jim Crow
James Sturm, kissed and caressed by the baseball gods, has dipped his pen in the fountain of baseball legend and written a profoundly moving story featuring pitching great Satchel Paige.
Mat Johnson's "Incognegro" Great Even After Black History Month
A clever Negro travels to the pit of murderous White supremacy in this spectacular graphic novel from Vertigo.
Why I left America and Other Essays
Many will find Harrington’s words for white Americans to be harsh and negative
"5 Shots" Takes a Shot at Crime Drama
Like Brubaker and Phillips' Criminal, it hits the right notes.
Robert Morales Introduces "The Truth"
Scribe opens controversial series with "no ways tired" men.
Milestone Media: Hardware #1
I admire Shakespeare, but I love McDuffie.
Trevor Von Eeden: Thriller #1
The cutting edge when they first appeared, Von Eeden's layouts and page designs still look sharp over two decades later.
Milestone Media: Static #4
Do The Right Thing